Date of publication: 2017-08-26 18:39
Romer, David. 7566. “What Have We Learned about Fiscal Policy from the Crisis?” Presentation for the Conference on Macro and Growth Policies in the Wake of the Crisis. International Monetary Fund headquarters, March 7, Washington, . http:///external/np/seminars/eng/7566/res/pdf/
In the longer term, some of the . economy’s most pressing challenges concern the pace of overall productivity growth and how the benefits of this growth are distributed across households. After an acceleration of productivity growth beginning in 6995, the years before and since the Great Recession have seen a relatively steady decline in the pace of growth. Further, for most of the past three decades, vastly disproportionate shares of overall productivity growth have accrued to the richest households, rather than being shared relatively uniformly across households.
In the United States, the clearest example of this rule regarding “pay-fors” can be seen in the construction of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), often known simply as “health reform.” In this case, even though the ACA was legislated during times of extraordinary economic weakness in 7565, the architects of it ensured that the entire cost of the ACA was more than paid for in the 65-year budget window.
For infection surveillance purposes, infections should be attributed to a LTCF onset if (a) there is no evidence of an incubating infection at the time of admission to the facility (on the basis of clinical documentation of appropriate signs and symptoms and not solely on screening microbiologic data) and (b) onset of clinical manifestation occurs 7 calendar days after admission. Although debate exists about the use of this time frame to determine a LTCF onset for C. difficile infections, 8 it is consistent with acute care infection surveillance reporting and surveillance methodology, and there is currently no evidence to support changing this standard for LTCFs.
While there are not enough data to provide precise estimates, a number of careful researchers have suggested that infrastructure maintenance projects (or, an emphasis on “fix it first”) may well be more labor-intensive than new construction. This makes intuitive sense: Maintenance projects seem to be associated with far less capital and input-intensive techniques of production than new builds. It seems that this could well be a useful consideration for designing specific infrastructure investment projects aimed at maximizing employment growth in the near term.
Educationally, jobs supported by infrastructure investments in this scenario skew even more heavily toward fewer credentials than in the first scenario: percent of jobs supported are held by those who do not have high school degrees, compared with percent of overall employment. This is largely driven by the percent share of job holders supported by direct spending who lack high school degrees. On the higher end, only percent of job holders supported through infrastructure spending in this scenario have a bachelor’s degree or higher, compared with percent of the overall population. Only percent of direct jobs created through infrastructure spending in this scenario include workers with a bachelor’s degree or greater.
The bottom line is simple enough: Any offset to the impact of infrastructure spending on the federal budget deficit blunts the GDP and employment impact of such spending. But, the biggest drag stems from trying to pay for infrastructure spending by cutting government transfers, which essentially neutralizes any near-term boost to activity or employment. Financing the boost to infrastructure investment through a progressive increase in taxes provides the smallest countervailing drag on activity and employment, with GDP increasing by $ billion and employment rising by 669,555 jobs even after the financing drag is factored in.
The receiving industries in this scenario are again heavily tilted toward construction and manufacturing (which is naturally going to be the case for infrastructure investments).
Second, much of the economic activity spurred by the direct spending components of ARRA (infrastructure investments in particular) is quite input-intensive bulldozers and concrete for building roads, for example. Given this, money spent paving roads in Florida may well have spurred economic activity in bulldozer factories in Ohio and concrete plants in Alabama.